(Central Square) – Parents across the country have come together to challenge a recently passed California bill that would allow judges to terminate the parental rights of an out-of-state child who requires transgender surgery, puberty blockers and more.

Parental rights groups say they have “serious problems” with SB 107, which would allow California to adopt “temporary emergency jurisdiction” over a child who comes to California for transgender surgery or drugs, effectively stripping parents of control over their children. children.

The groups sent a letter to California Governor Gavin Newsom urging him to veto the bill.

“SB 107 grossly violates the fundamental right of every parent in every state to direct the upbringing and care of their child,” the letter said. “This legislation allows a child to be ‘transported’ to California (without the parents’ knowledge or consent) to receive gender reassignment procedures — including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and irreversible surgeries — and impermissibly empowers California courts to strip custody of legitimate and bona fide children.” parents (regardless of where they live) who may have legitimate concerns for their child’s mental and physical health.’

The parents also say the law “violates parental rights by denying parents access to their child’s medical information related to gender identity medications and procedures in California.”

“Several sections (1, 2, 3, and 10) of this legislation require parents to withhold important medical information about their child, even if that information is requested by subpoena,” the letter states. “This undermines the constitutional rights of parents and also likely violates the laws of many other states that recognize a parent’s right to access their child’s health information.”

The bill in question, which passed along party lines, aims to make California a sanctuary state for transgender youth in response to other states banning things like transgender surgeries for minors. SB 107 blocks the release of these medical records or extradition from California.

The parents say that section, in particular, violates the Constitution, arguing that it “unlawfully abrogates the jurisdiction of the courts in the family’s home state, which are normally the proper forum for custody determinations, and is inconsistent with various federal laws that determine, which state courts have jurisdiction to determine child custody.”

“Deference to the laws and jurisdiction of the 49 other states is required by the ‘full faith and credit’ clause of the US Constitution,” the letter said. “California cannot ignore the authority and jurisdiction of other states.”

Supporters say the bill aims to encourage and protect trans youth.

“California must stand up for LGBTQ children and their families, especially when they are under attack across the country,” state Sen. Scott Wiener of San Francisco said in a statement. “SB 107 ensures that California is a sanctuary state for trans children and their parents, so they can be safe here.”

But the parents say that this is a violation of their rights and the imposition of an ideological program on them from top to bottom.

“SB 107 makes California look like a piper, luring minor children across the country to leave their families and run away in pursuit of harmful drugs and sterilization surgeries, causing irreversible damage to the minds, bodies and family relationships of America’s precious children. “, the letter says. “According to the American College of Pediatricians, 80 to 95 percent of children who experience gender confusion will eventually accept their biological sex if they are not encouraged to seek gender identity treatment. Children who experience gender confusion need the love, support and guidance of their parents.

“They should not be taken from their parents and thrown down a path that leads to lifelong medical care and sterilization,” the letter added.

Legal critics say the California law would violate parents’ constitutional rights.

“Parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing and care of their children, which includes making the best decisions about their child’s mental, emotional and physical health,” said Emily Kao, senior counsel at Alliance Defending Freedom. “In stunning disregard for federal law and the constitutional rights of parents, California wants to take custody of children away from their own parents — no matter what state they’re from — and deny families the right to access their child’s health information. Fortunately, a growing coalition of parents, leaders, and organizations are standing up to protect our children, basic parental rights, and state jurisdiction.”

Source link